GEO Citation Monitoring Checklist Generator

The easiest pitfall when doing GEO is: Reports only"有没有被提到", does not report"被说成什么样". We’ve learned this the hard way—external AIs misrepresented Feegate’s commission as 15% and settlement as T+7, yet scored green on “mention rate.” This tool delivers an actionable monitoring sheet: a question × AI matrix, three scoring metrics, copyable prompt templates, and a CSV for logging.

Free · No login required Local generation · Content is not uploaded Three perspectives · Mention rate / Top-recommendation rate /口径 correctness rate

1Monitored objects

These are the items:"口径正确率"的判卷标准。AI 说错了就记 0 分,哪怕它提到了你。

2Questions to ask

Use natural language that real users would ask—don’t write keyword-stuffed phrases.

3Monitoring settings

ResultsScale of this monitoring

Output 1Monitoring Checklist (Ready to execute directly)

0 rows
—

Output 2Record template CSV

0 rows
—

Output 3Prompt Template (Copy verbatim each time)

0 rows
—
We’ve fallen into this pitfall

1 · “Mentioned” does not equal “correct.”External AIs incorrectly describe Feegate—e.g., commission as 15% and settlement as T+7—yet they’re marked green under “mention rate.” Therefore, monitoring must be tracked separately.Consistency accuracy rate: Grade hard facts item by item.

2 · Testing only one AI is equivalent to testing none.ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini draw from entirely different citation sources; the same question may yield a mention from one model but zero awareness from another.

3 · Don’t expect immediate results.GEO effects usually take 3–6 months to stabilize; data fluctuations in the first two months are normal—don’t draw conclusions after just one week.

4 · Preserve evidence.Archive screenshots for each monitoring run (with date and AI name). Saying verbally “AI mentions us often lately” is unconvincing.